.jpg)
RACV has backed several recommendations made by Infrastructure Victoria (IV) in its latest report on transport congestion solutions, saying it will assist in the wider transport discussion for improving road and transport systems in the state.
“While RACV has long called for better infrastructure for Victorians, we also understand the need for better use of our existing infrastructure,” said Bryce Prosser, RACV’s general manager of public policy and corporate affairs. “It is therefore good to see Infrastructure Victoria provide some important points of discussion on how we can improve our road and public transport systems.”
RACV said IV's proposal to introduce off-peak fares is a sensible option that could potentially reduce road and public transport peak-hour congestion if commuters change at least one of their daily trips from peak hour.
The auto insurer also expressed its support of IV's recommendation to review underperforming bus routes, particularly its proposal to look at replacing low-demand routes with on-demand bus services.
Another key issue cited in the report was the allocation of road space. The report called for the removal of car parking along major arterials including Hoddle Street, St Kilda Rd, and Sydney Road to improve traffic flow.
“Car parking is the least economic use of valuable road space,” Prosser said. “When looking at better ways to transport people along roads, trams, bicycles, and moving cars should always be prioritised over parked cars.”
When it comes to expanding the car park levy, RACV said the state and local governments should clearly demonstrate that the funds raised from the levy are being put to good use.
“While RACV is not opposed to the principle of an expanded car park levy on commercial long-term parking spaces, there must be a strong case for the geographical expansion of the levy outside of the CBD,” Prosser said. “The levy also must not materially impact residents in suburban areas; and the money raised must be credibly used to improve local transport outcomes. If these caveats cannot be met, the proposal will carry little public support.”
