By Crawford & Company
TORONTO (January 30, 2019) - Crawford & Company (Canada) Inc. announces the further growth of its legal services offering with the addition of Prab Dhami as a litigation lawyer within the team. Crawford Legal Services’ team of highly qualified and experienced lawyers has provided insurance defense services to its clients for more than 20 years. The addition of Dhami to the team enhances Crawford’s insurance defense and subrogation solution to expedite the claim process and bring intelligent, customized solutions to clients.
“We are excited to have Prab join our team, and we are confident that she will be instrumental in providing our clients with innovative subrogation service solutions to achieve our mission of restoring and enhancing lives, businesses and communities.” said Mini Kohli, vice president, Legal Services, Crawford & Company (Canada) Inc.
As a legal professional, Dhami practices primarily in civil litigation in the area of insurance defense, including both tort and accident benefits matters, with a focus on personal injury, property loss and subrogation. In her previous role at a well-known insurance defense firm, she regularly appeared before various levels of Ontario Courts and Administrative Tribunals. As a client-focused legal professional, she critically reviews and analyzes the evidence to provide detailed legal opinions, and she advocates zealously on behalf of the client.
For additional information, please contact:
Mini Kohli
Vice President, Legal Services
Email: [email protected]
For media inquiries, please contact:
Amanda Bortolus
Marketing Director, Crawford & Company (Canada) Inc.
Email: [email protected]
Based in Atlanta, Crawford & Company (NYSE: CRD‐A and CRD‐B) is the world’s largest publicly listed independent provider of claims management and outsourcing solutions to carriers, brokers and corporates with an expansive global network serving clients in more than 70 countries. The Company’s two classes of stock are substantially identical, except with respect to voting rights and the Company’s ability to pay greater cash dividends on the non-voting Class A Common Stock (CRD-A) than on the voting Class B Common Stock (CRD-B), subject to certain limitations. In addition, with respect to mergers or similar transactions, holders of CRD-A must receive the same type and amount of consideration as holders of CRD-B, unless different consideration is approved by the holders of 75 percent of CRD-A, voting as a class.
